Myth vs Fact

What people say, what the record shows, and the proof. We check claims from every side, including ones popular among Hindus.

24claims checked

Every verdict links to its sources. If you can show us a better source, we will look again.

People say

“The Taj Mahal was really a Shiva temple called Tejo Mahalaya.”

Tap for the fact ↻
False

The Taj Mahal is the tomb Shah Jahan built for Mumtaz Mahal from 1632, on land he took from Raja Jai Singh of Amber in exchange for other property. No record of a temple on the site has ever been produced.

See the proof →
People say

“The Qutb Minar was a Hindu tower, the Vishnu Stambh, renamed by the Sultans.”

Tap for the fact ↻
False

The minar was begun by Qutb-ud-din Aibak around 1199 and raised higher by Iltutmish. What is true is that the mosque at its foot was built from demolished temples, as its own inscription says, and that the iron pillar beside it is a Gupta-era standard of Bhagwan Vishnu.

See the proof →
People say

“The Delhi iron pillar never rusts because of a lost secret technology.”

Tap for the fact ↻
Half-true

The pillar resists rust remarkably well, and the reason has been worked out: its iron is rich in phosphorus and was made by forge-welding lumps of bloomery iron, which lets a thin protective film form on the surface. It is a real achievement of Gupta-era smiths, and it is known, not lost.

See the proof →
People say

“In all its history, India never invaded any other country.”

Tap for the fact ↻
Misleading

Indian kings did send armies and fleets beyond their borders: Rajaraja Chola into Lanka, Rajendra Chola across the sea to Srivijaya in 1025, Lalitaditya of Kashmir far into the north-west. What is true is that Hindu culture spread across South-East Asia mostly by trade, priests and marriage, not by conquest.

See the proof →
People say

“Hindus never wrote history; they only wrote myths and religious books.”

Tap for the fact ↻
False

Bharat kept history in its own forms: dated royal inscriptions by the thousand, temple chronicles, court genealogies, and full histories such as Kalhana’s Rajatarangini (1148–49) and the Ahom Buranjis.

See the proof →
People say

“Zero and our numerals were invented by the Arabs.”

Tap for the fact ↻
False

Zero as a number, with rules for working with it, is set out by Brahmagupta in 628 CE. The Arabs learned the nine figures and zero from India and called them Hindi numerals; Europe then learned them from the Arabs and called them Arabic.

See the proof →
People say

“Chess was invented in Persia.”

Tap for the fact ↻
False

The Persians’ own books say chess came to them from India. The Indian game chaturanga, named for the four limbs of an army, reached the court of Khosrow I in the 6th century and became shatranj.

See the proof →
People say

“Sanskrit is a dead language that nobody speaks.”

Tap for the fact ↻
Misleading

Few people speak Sanskrit as their first language, 24,821 in the 2011 census, but it has never stopped being used: in daily worship across the world, in scholarship, in new writing, in a daily newspaper since 1970 and in villages where families speak it at home.

See the proof →
People say

“Vasco da Gama discovered the sea route to India in 1498.”

Tap for the fact ↻
Misleading

Da Gama found a way for Portuguese ships to reach India round Africa. The sea route across the Arabian Sea was centuries old, and he crossed it from Malindi to Calicut with a pilot taken on in East Africa, reaching the coast near Kappad on 20 May 1498.

See the proof →
People say

“Akbar treated every faith equally and never made war in the name of religion.”

Tap for the fact ↻
Half-true

From the 1560s Akbar lifted the pilgrim tax and the jizya and later let Hindu nobles build great temples. But his own victory letter after Chittor in 1568 calls the war a holy war against infidels, and the massacre there is recorded by his own historian.

See the proof →
People say

“India was never one country until the British united it.”

Tap for the fact ↻
Misleading

The British joined most of the subcontinent under one administration, but the idea of Bharat as one land is written in the Puranas, walked by pilgrims from Kedarnath to Rameswaram, and was ruled as one by the Mauryas from Kandahar to Karnataka.

See the proof →
People say

“Bakhtiyar Khalji burned Nalanda’s library, and it smouldered for three months.”

Tap for the fact ↻
Half-true

Turkish raids under Muhammad bin Bakhtiyar Khalji around 1200 ruined the great viharas of Bihar and killed many monks, and Nalanda never recovered. But no contemporary source names a library fire lasting months; that detail is a modern addition.

See the proof →
People say

“The Koh-i-Noor was gifted to the British by the Sikh court.”

Tap for the fact ↻
False

The Koh-i-Noor was surrendered under Article III of the Treaty of Lahore of 29 March 1849, imposed on the ten-year-old Maharaja Duleep Singh after the British defeated the Sikh army and annexed Punjab.

See the proof →
People say

“Plastic surgery was invented by European doctors.”

Tap for the fact ↻
False

The Sushruta Samhita describes rebuilding a nose with a flap of living skin, and British surgeons learned the forehead-flap method from Indian practitioners: it was reported from Pune in 1794 and first performed in England by Joseph Carpue in 1814.

See the proof →
People say

“Ancient Indian astronomers believed the Earth was flat.”

Tap for the fact ↻
False

Indian astronomical works treat the Earth as a sphere. Aryabhata in 499 CE described the Earth as a round globe hanging in space and said it turns on its axis, so that the stars only seem to move west.

See the proof →
People say

“NASA’s satellite photos prove Ram Setu is a man-made bridge and give its age.”

Tap for the fact ↻
False

NASA never said this. Its images of 2002 show a chain of shoals between Pamban and Mannar, and NASA stated that photographs from orbit cannot tell the origin or age of such a chain. The Setu stands on the authority of the Ramayana, not on NASA.

See the proof →
People say

“Hindu kings feared the sea and never built navies.”

Tap for the fact ↻
False

The Cholas sent a fleet across the Bay of Bengal to strike Srivijaya in 1025. Shivaji built sea forts and a fighting navy, and later Kanhoji Angre, Sarkhel of the Maratha fleet, held the Konkan coast against the English, Portuguese and Dutch until his death in 1729.

See the proof →
People say

“Shivaji was a secular modern ruler; dharma had no part in his Swaraj.”

Tap for the fact ↻
Misleading

Shivaji treated people of every faith with fairness, but his Swaraj was built on dharma: he was crowned with Vedic rites in 1674, restored temples, and replaced Persian court terms with Sanskrit ones.

See the proof →
People say

“Shivaji fought only against Muslims, and only Hindus served him.”

Tap for the fact ↻
Misleading

Shivaji fought for Swaraj against whoever stood in its way, Hindu chiefs and Mughal-serving Rajputs included, and Muslim officers such as Siddi Hilal and his naval commander Daulat Khan served him.

See the proof →
People say

“Baudhayana proved the Pythagoras theorem centuries before Pythagoras.”

Tap for the fact ↻
Half-true

Baudhayana’s Shulbasutra states the rule clearly, for any rectangle, as part of building Vedic fire-altars, but it gives no proof in the Greek sense. The rule was also known in Old Babylonia, whose clay tablet Plimpton 322 lists such triples around 1800 BCE.

See the proof →
People say

“The Vaimanika Shastra proves ancient Indians built working aeroplanes.”

Tap for the fact ↻
False

The Vaimanika Shastra was dictated by Pandit Subbaraya Shastry in the early 20th century and first printed in 1973. Aeronautical engineers at the Indian Institute of Science studied it in 1974 and found its craft could not fly.

See the proof →
People say

“After the Kalinga war, Ashoka gave up force and disbanded his army.”

Tap for the fact ↻
Misleading

Ashoka’s own Rock Edict XIII records his remorse for Kalinga and his turn to dhamma, but the same edict warns the forest peoples that he still has the power to punish, and he kept Kalinga and his army.

See the proof →
People say

“India won its freedom without firing a single shot.”

Tap for the fact ↻
Misleading

Gandhi’s mass movements were the broadest part of the struggle, but they were not the only part. From 1857 to the revolutionaries, the Azad Hind Fauj and the naval revolt of February 1946, armed resistance was part of how Indians fought and how Britain judged it could no longer hold India.

See the proof →
People say

“Bharat is a modern name; the country was always called India.”

Tap for the fact ↻
False

Bharata is the land’s own ancient name, found in the Puranas, the Mahabharata and the Hathigumpha inscription of Kharavela. India came through Persian and Greek from Sindhu, the river. Article 1 of the Constitution keeps both: India, that is Bharat.

See the proof →

Propaganda Buster

The narratives that were written about Bharat on purpose: who wrote them, when, and what the evidence says.

All dossiers
DossierFalse

“Aryan invaders from Central Asia conquered India and destroyed the Indus cities.”

Shaped in the 19th century by comparative philology (F. Max Müller), turned into racial science by colonial census ethnology (H. H. Risley, The People of India, 1908), and given its "proof" by Mortimer Wheeler’s report on Harappa in Ancient India no. 3 (1947), where he wrote that "Indra stands accused".

No invasion, battle layer or destruction has been found in the Harappan cities. They declined over centuries as rivers shifted and the climate dried, the 2019 Rakhigarhi genome shows no steppe ancestry in a Harappan, and Harappan practices such as fire altars continue into later Bharat.

Read the dossier →
DossierFalse

“India had no real history or worthwhile learning until the British arrived.”

James Mill, The History of British India (1817), written without visiting India or knowing an Indian language; and Thomas Babington Macaulay’s Minute on Indian Education (2 February 1835).

Bharat recorded its past in tens of thousands of dated inscriptions, in court and temple chronicles and in histories such as the Rajatarangini, and its sciences of grammar, mathematics, astronomy and medicine were studied by the very scholars who belittled them.

Read the dossier →
DossierFalse

“Indian history is just a string of conquests; Hindus never resisted and simply submitted.”

Stated most bluntly by Karl Marx in "The Future Results of British Rule in India", New-York Daily Tribune, 8 August 1853, which called Indian history only the history of successive intruders who built empires "on the passive basis of that unresisting and unchanging society"; echoed in colonial textbooks for a century.

Bharat fought back for more than a thousand years. The Arabs were held at Sindh for three centuries, Kashmir turned back Mahmud of Ghazni, the Ahoms beat the Mughals at Saraighat, and by the 1750s the Marathas were the leading power in India. Unlike Persia or Egypt, most of the land never changed its faith.

Read the dossier →
DossierMisleading

“Temples were attacked only for loot and politics, never because of religion.”

Argued by Richard M. Eaton in "Temple Desecration and Indo-Muslim States" (Frontline, January 2001) and by Romila Thapar in Somanatha: The Many Voices of a History (2004), and repeated in simpler form in many textbooks and articles that leave out the chroniclers’ own words.

Wealth and politics were real motives, as historians have shown, but the chroniclers who served the conquerors described temple destruction in religious terms, and Aurangzeb’s order of April 1669 was a general order against temples and their schools, not a search for treasure.

Read the dossier →