People say

“Hindus never wrote history; they only wrote myths and religious books.”

False
The fact

Bharat kept history in its own forms: dated royal inscriptions by the thousand, temple chronicles, court genealogies, and full histories such as Kalhana’s Rajatarangini (1148–49) and the Ahom Buranjis.

The proof

  1. Kalhana’s Rajatarangini (1148–49) traces the kings of Kashmir in eight books and tells the historian to stand free of love and hatred, like a judge.
  2. The Aihole inscription of Pulakeshin II dates itself both to 3,735 years after the Bharata war and to Shaka 556, that is 634–35 CE.
  3. The Ahom court kept Buranjis, prose chronicles in Tai and Assamese, across six centuries of rule from 1228.

01History in stone and palm leaf

Indian kings wrote their history where it could not be lost: on rock, on temple walls and on copper plates given with land grants. A single Chola temple can carry decades of dated records of gifts, wars and village assemblies. The Madala Panji of the Jagannath temple at Puri is a running chronicle. The Marathas wrote bakhars, among them Sabhasad’s life of Shivaji, written at Jinji in the 1690s. What colonial writers missed was a familiar shape. They looked for a Gibbon and did not read the walls.

Read on