People say

“NASA’s satellite photos prove Ram Setu is a man-made bridge and give its age.”

False
The fact

NASA never said this. Its images of 2002 show a chain of shoals between Pamban and Mannar, and NASA stated that photographs from orbit cannot tell the origin or age of such a chain. The Setu stands on the authority of the Ramayana, not on NASA.

The proof

  1. The "17,50,000-year-old man-made bridge" claim began with an Indian newspaper report of October 2002 built around NASA images; NASA disowned the reading.
  2. Valmiki Ramayana, Yuddha Kanda: Nala, son of Vishvakarma, built the setu with the vanara army, a hundred yojanas long and ten wide.

01Let the Ramayana speak for itself

Valmiki tells how the ocean god advised Shri Ram that Nala could bridge the sea, how the vanaras hauled rocks and trees, and how the setu was finished in five days, a line across the waves like the parting in a woman’s hair. For the devotee that is the authority, and Rameswaram, Dhanushkodi and Setu-bandha have been tirthas for that reason. A borrowed and false NASA stamp adds nothing to it and gives critics an easy target. Respect the Itihasa by quoting it, and quote NASA only for what NASA actually said.

Read on