Photo: Original work by Kalhana, manuscript written by an unknown s · Public domain
Scholar

Kalhana

Historian of Kashmir, author of the Rajatarangini

12th century CE; Rajatarangini 1148–1150 CE

Kalhana, son of Champaka, minister to King Harsha of Kashmir, wrote the Rajatarangini (‘River of Kings’) in 1148–1150 CE: about 7,800 verses in eight tarangas tracing the kings of Kashmir from the earliest times to his own day.

“That noble-minded poet alone deserves praise whose word, like that of a judge, keeps free from love or hatred in recording the past.”Rajatarangini 1.7

01A historian’s method

Kalhana tells his readers how he worked. He read eleven earlier chronicles and the Nilamata Purana, studied the inscriptions on temple foundations, the grants of land, the praise-tablets and manuscripts, and set them against one another. He says plainly where his early sources are thin. For the centuries closer to him, the Karkota and Utpala kings, Lalitaditya’s campaigns, the building of Avantipura and Martand, the account grows detailed and dated by the Laukika era. For his own century he writes as a witness, naming the cruelty and the folly of kings, including the master his father served.

02The only true chronicle

Because it is dated, critical and continuous, the Rajatarangini is the backbone of early Kashmiri history, and historians of all India lean on it. Jonaraja, Shrivara and Prajyabhatta continued it into the Sultanate and Mughal years. Aurel Stein edited the text in 1892 and published his English translation, with maps of the ancient sites, in 1900, after walking much of the valley to identify the places Kalhana names. Kalhana closes the work in the Laukika year 4225, 1149–50 CE.

Karkota dynasty of Kashmir
Dynasty · c. 625–855 CEKarkota dynasty of KashmirThe Karkotas made Kashmir a power for two centuries. Lalitaditya Muktapida, the greatest of them, raised the sun temple at Martand and the city of Parihasapura.Read →

“That noble-minded poet alone deserves praise whose word, like that of a judge, keeps free from love or hatred in recording the past.”

Rajatarangini 1.7